LulzBot Unboxing
- Anders var utålmodig, og brugte sin vindtunnel til at køle med
- Utålmodige Anders
17 jan
Kommentarer lukket til Reparere billige Denver Wake-up lampe
Jeg havde to billige wake-up lamper fra Harald Nyborg der begge fejlede med samme symptomer: lyset var permanent tændt så snart strømmen var sat til, i stedet for at kunne slukkes og dæmpes. Grunden til nr. 2 blev købt var at nr. 1 fejlede efter garantien udløb, og til 200,- kunne det jo knapt betale sig at kigge på det. Da nr. 2 fejlede med samme symptom blev jeg stædig og irriteret over kun at kunne lave “brug-og-smid-væk”.
Hvor svært kunne det være at reparere noget billigt Kina-skrammel? Ikke ret svært viste det sig. Skidtet blev åbnet, og viser ret tydeligt hvor meget kvalitet man får for ikke ret mange penge:
Efter lidt konsultation af nogle af de mere elektronik-kyndige fik vi lokaliseret fejlen til en Triac der nok var brændt af. Desværre havde producenten valgt at slibe teksten af, så det var umuligt at se hvilken chip det var (sådan noget svineri!) — det virkede dog heldigvis med en helt standard BT137. På den ene lampe var der også brændt en modstand af: den var helt forkullet, men heldigvis kunne vi se på den anden hvilken modstand det var.
Efter at have loddet ny triac og modstand på, virkede lamperne som nye 🙂
Kan det betale sig at reparere billigt Kina-skrammel der er gået i stykker? Måske ikke økonomisk, til gengæld risikerer man at lære noget. Og så er det jo ret fedt at kunne fixe ting selv, i stedet for kun at kunne købe og smide væk!
14 jun
Yesterday our PrintrBot Jr made its first useful prints!
It has taken quite some effort to get to this stage, mostly because I knew nothing about 3d-printers when we started the project, and the original builders were out of town (but have now returned).
We have made quite some modifications to the printer, mostly inspired by this blog post. Specifically we have (as documented on our wiki):
At this point our main problem is with adhesion of the first layer. We have experimented with a glass plate because we want to add a heated bed. We learned a couple of lessons from that, namely:
At this point we are back to printing on painter’s tape directly on top of the original wood plate. It seems sufficiently flat for the small prints we have done until now. A heated bed is definitely a thing to do, we plan to mill a PCB on our Bungard machine, following something like http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:91403 (however note that I read double-sided PCB is recommended, because heating only one side will result in the PCB warping).
With regards to calibrating the axis for the correct number of steps the instructions at http://reprap.org/wiki/Calibration has the following quote:
The following information concerning steps/mm adjustments is outdated. It has since been agreed that steps/mm should be set to the exact calculated values since printing with non-ideal steps/mm results in an accurate test piece, but makes the dimensions on every other part even more inaccurate.
… which sort of appeals to me because it is less labor, and the correct solution can be calculated. Thus, we are now using calculated values from the very awesome RepRap Calculator: X-axis: 80 steps/mm, Y-axis: 80 steps/mm, Z-axis: 2560 steps/mm. The extruder is currently at 600 steps/mm, but this is per calibration; the PrintrBot documentation mentions a default of 569 steps/mm.
With all this effort we are now able to print various small items improving the printer:
03 apr
0 Comments